Various independent 3rd parties have evaluated the REALice technology:
The Polymer Technology Group Eindhoven BV (PTG/e) of the University of Eindhoven, measured the decrease in viscosity due to the removal of microbubbles between 3 and 17 percent, depending on water quality and temperature.
Southern California Edison tested ice hardness with a Schmidt hammer and found REALice-treated ice harder and more uniform across the sheet than ice made with hot water.
Lulea University in Sweden performed an ice crystal comparison showing that the REALice treated crystal are formed stronger
FortisBC ran a large scale pilot in 2014 evaluating 10 arenas across British Columbia, showing an average of natural gas reduction of 330 GJ.
Summary:
- 90% of the pilot participants successfully adapted their operations to REALice® technology.
- The achieved ice quality was evaluated from acceptable to excellent.
- Fortis quantified the average savings across the participating pilot arenas at 330 GJ in Natural Gas per year
- Across the pilot arenas, an increase of the slab temperature was required at all sites and an average increase of 3°F was observed. A reduction in the ice slab thickness on average by 0.25 – 0.5 inch was noted also.
- Electricity savings from the warmer slab temperature and the thinner ice come on top of the gas savings in the FortisBC report; sub-metered rinks have measured 29–45% less refrigeration energy.
In addition, 15+ electric utilities across North America have vetted the system for multiple sites for energy incentives.
See all measured results