Rinks flood with hot water for one reason that matters: it holds almost no trapped air. For decades the rule has been hot floodwater on cold ice. Hot water spreads well and freezes clear, and it earned its place. But every 140–160°F flood also puts heat and moisture into a building that is working hard to stay cold and dry, and the refrigeration plant then has to take all of it back out. The traditional method solves a water-quality problem by creating a refrigeration problem. REALice separates the two: it gives the water the properties that made hot water useful, without the heat.
Tap water carries undissolved air as micro bubbles. Freeze it as it comes and the bubbles stay in the ice: it turns cloudy and brittle, chips under skates and needs more floods to repair. Heating the water drives that air out, which is why hot floods freeze clear and hard. The heat is not what makes good ice; the air removal is. A rink pays twice: once to heat the water, once to pull that heat back out of the slab.
REALice removes the same micro bubbles with water pressure instead of heat, in a unit on the fill line to the resurfacer; the three stages are described below. The water that reaches the ice is de-aerated, slightly less viscous, and no warmer than it needs to be: cold tap water, tempered if the rink prefers, but never above 68°F.
Cold water alone makes poor ice. Operators who tried it before have the cloudy sheets to prove it. The point is not cold water; it is water without trapped air.
REALice uses water pressure to remove the micro air bubbles from the floodwater before it reaches the resurfacer. It does this in three stages:
Every flood gives the refrigeration plant three jobs. One of them is the same for any water. The other two get bigger the hotter the flood is and the colder the rink is kept.
A 160°F flood has to be brought all the way down to 32°F before any ice can form. The hotter the water, the bigger this job.
Turning 32°F water into 32°F ice. This takes the same energy for hot or cold water, so it doesn't change.
The new ice then has to be pulled down to the operating set point. The colder the set point, the bigger this job.
Cold conditioned water almost removes job one: there's no hot flood to cool down. And because the ice it makes is harder, the rink can run a warmer set point, so job three gets smaller too. Less work for the compressors means less electricity, on top of the gas that no longer heats the water.
The Polymer Technology Group at Eindhoven University of Technology tested REALice-treated water against untreated water from the same supply, in three batches:
Lower viscosity is why treated cold water spreads and levels the way hot water does. Fewer undissolved bubbles is why it freezes with fewer tiny air pockets. Together they replace the two things hot water was being used for.
The conditioned state holds for about a day. Fill the resurfacer at the end of the night and it's ready in the morning; there's no need to dump and refill. Water that sits for days or gets moved around picks up air again, which is why REALice belongs at the fill station, not upstream of a storage tank, and why the resurfacer shouldn't be trickle-filled.
PTG Eindhoven, 2011. Vortex Process Technology brief (PDF)
Crystal structure. Treated and untreated municipal water from the same supply were frozen side by side and thin slices examined under cross-polarized light, with the imaging done at Luleå University of Technology. The untreated sample was fragmented and irregular; the REALice sample showed larger, more uniform, more consolidated crystals. The report was written by the manufacturer, Watreco.
Hardness. Southern California Edison tested two rinks with a Schmidt hammer before and after REALice. Readings were as good or better after, and far more uniform across the sheet. The hammer measures rebound hardness, not density; the result is consistent with denser ice but doesn't measure it. The evidence in full →
Further independent measurement of REALice-treated water and ice is under way at the University of Massachusetts Amherst. Results will be published here when released.
The biggest electricity saving comes from the set point: warmer brine, fewer compressor hours. Years of hot-water flooding have taught technicians that 22–24°F is the ceiling for hockey ice, and with hot water it is. De-aerated water changes that. The ice is harder and more consolidated to start with, so it can run warmer and be better for it; O.R.F.A. puts the best blade-to-ice glide at 28°F. A warmer set point isn't weaker ice. Once the rink is dialled in, it's the correct temperature for a stronger sheet.
The crew finds the sweet spot by raising the set point in small steps over several days and watching the ice; once found, it's the baseline for the following season. That change in habit is the real work of the first weeks, and it is the one that has to happen: leave the set point where it was and the ice is too hard and chips, and most of the electricity saving never appears. Operator training and certification comes with every system, for the whole crew and for the people who replace them.
Carleton Place Arena found 26°F with a 1°F differential too cold and 27°F too warm, and their controls only moved in whole degrees. They ran 26°F with a 2°F return differential instead and got the ice they wanted. REALice doesn't replace the technician's judgement; it rewards it.
The rink tells you. If the set point is still too low for conditioned water, you'll see:
Each of these is a reason to go up a step, not down. Conditioned water freezes readily, and kept too cold it flash-freezes; the symptoms above are what that looks like.
| What operators see | What's behind it | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Water spreads and levels differently | Lower viscosity: the flood spreads evenly without heat. | Measured (PTG) |
| Ice feels harder | Fewer air pockets and larger, more uniform crystals make a more compact layer. | Measured (SCE); imaging (Luleå) |
| Less snow, fewer scars, faster recovery | A stronger surface breaks down less under blades, once the set point is at the sweet spot. | Operator-observed |
| Clear ice; lines and logos sharp | No micro-bubbles in the water to scatter light in the ice. | Measured (PTG) and observed |
| Less humidity, fog and frost | No hot-water moisture spike at every flood; the dehumidifier and ventilation have less to do. | Operator-observed |
| Brine set point 3–5°F warmer with no loss of quality | Cold floods put far less heat into the slab, and the ice is harder to begin with. | Operator-observed; metered as electricity savings |
| No scale in nozzles, lines or tank | Hardness minerals form loose aragonite crystals that wash through, instead of calcite scale that bonds to pipes and nozzles. | Water chemistry; observed. Hard water → |
That is the mechanism. For what it produced in real rinks — FortisBC's ten-rink verification, Uxbridge's sub-metered twin pad, Caledon, Kitchener — with the method behind every number, see measured results.
Snow isn't just an ice-quality issue. Every shovel of snow the resurfacer removes is surface that has to be replaced with new floodwater, which has to be frozen again, which is plant load, water, operator time and blade wear. Harder ice at the right temperature sheds less, so the resurfacer takes less off and puts less back. Better water makes better ice, better ice makes less snow, less snow needs less replacement water, and less replacement water is less refrigeration. The energy saving is the end of that loop, not the start of it.
One adjustment: conditioned cold water doesn't melt snow and debris out of scars the way hot water does. Use the resurfacer's wash-water function on every ice clean so the scars are flushed before the new flood goes down. If the machine has no wash water, cut slightly more ice during the clean to remove that material mechanically. It's a small change in practice, and it's the one that matters most in the first weeks.
Untreated cold water does, if it's simply swapped for hot without changing anything else. Conditioned water is different and needs a warmer set point. Snow, scarring and pass-lane ridges after the switch mean the rink hasn't reached its sweet spot yet, not that the water is wrong.
No two rinks are alike: old barns, poor insulation, air leaks, humidity, slab condition. REALice doesn't need ideal conditions; it gives the operator better water and a clear way to adjust the rink around it.
Some use lukewarm water during transition, in very cold buildings, or where towel freezing is a concern. That still saves most of the energy of a 160°F flood. The direction of travel is toward the lowest floodwater temperature the rink supports.
It does melt a skin, and that skin refreezes with the flood. But a layer bonds when the flood freezes into the surface rather than on top of it, and what prevents that is ice that is too cold: the flood flash-freezes before it has spread, the same cause as pass-lane ridges. De-aerated water spreads thinner and more evenly, and at the warmer set point it freezes into the sheet. Flush the scars with wash water on every clean and the layers bond.
The opposite. The technician still controls thickness, set points, cut depth, water volume, wash water and blade condition. REALice improves the input so those decisions produce better ice with less energy.
REALice is already running in 200+ rinks across North America. We help you with the funding applications.
Get your free savings estimate